Sunday, January 15, 2006

Jimmy Wales

tection.
Jimmy Wales (November 2004)
Enlarge
Jimmy Wales (November 2004)

Jimmy Donal "Jimbo" Wales (born August 7, 1966) is the founder and President of the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit corporation which operates Wikipediawiki projects. Wales is also founder of the for-profit company Wikia (unrelated to Wikimedia), within which he co-founded the Wikicities and several other project.

Contents

[hide]

Life before Wikipedia

Wales was born in Huntsville, Alabama. His father, now retired, was a grocery store manager while Wales was growing up. Wales's mother Doris and grandmother Irma ran a small private school, "in the tradition of the one-room schoolhouse," where he also went to school. There were four children in his grade most of the time, so the school grouped together first through fourth grades and fifth through eighth grades. A May 2005 Time magazine article incorrectly reported that Wales was home schooled [1]. Strictly speaking Wales was not, but he did note that his schooling experience was "in a sense similar" since his mother and grandmother were his primary teachers. Students had a fair amount of freedom to study whatever they liked; the school's philosophy of education was significantly influenced by Montessori. Wales spent many hours poring over the World Book Encyclopedia during this time. After eighth grade, Wales went to Randolph School, a college prep school, which was and is an early adopter of computer labs and other technology for direct student use. This prep school was expensive for the family, since they had few means, but Wales reports that his family believed education was very important: "education was always a passion in my household ... you know, the very traditional approach to knowledge and learning and establishing that as a base for a good life."

He received his undergraduate degree from Auburn University and his masters from the University of Alabama. Later, he took courses offered in the Ph.D.finance programs at the University of Alabama and Indiana University. He taught at both universities during his postgraduate studies, but he did not write the doctoral dissertation required to earn a postgraduate degree at these institutions. Wales went on to become a futures and options trader in Chicago, and within a few years had earned enough to "support himself and his wife for the rest of their lives." (March 2005, Wired article)

In 1996, Wales founded a search portal called Bomis, which also sold softcore pornography photography until mid-2005. Because of his past position with Bomis, Wales was asked in a September 2005 C-SPAN interview about his involvement with what the interviewer, Brian Lamb, called "dirty pictures." In response, Wales described Bomis as a "guy-oriented search engine." [2] In an interview with Wired, he also explained that he disputed the categorization of Bomis content as "soft-core pornography": "If R-rated movies are porn, it was porn. In other words, no, it was not." [3] Wales is no longer actively involved in the company.

In March 2000, he started a peer-reviewed, open-content encyclopedia, Nupedia.com ("the free encyclopedia"), and hired Larry Sanger to be its editor-in-chief. While Wales was CEO, Bomis donated over $100,000 (primarily through salaries and providing free Internet access) to Nupedia and Wikipedia, and continued supporting them into 2002.

Work on Wikipedia

Jimmy Wales speaking at Wikimania 2005
Enlarge
Jimmy Wales speaking at Wikimania 2005
Main articles: History of Wikipedia, and [[{{{2}}}]], and [[{{{3}}}]], and [[{{{4}}}]], and [[{{{5}}}]]

Using a wiki to create encyclopedic content was publicly proposed by Larry Sanger on January 10, 2001. The wiki was set up by Wales and started on January 15, 2001. Wikipedia was at that point a wiki-based site intended for collaboration on early encyclopedic content before submitting it to Nupedia for peer review. Wikipedia's rapid growth soon made it the dominant project and Nupedia was mothballed.

Wales has sometimes been referred to in the press as the (implicitly) sole "founder" of Wikipedia, including in a 2004 Newsweek magazine article [4]. Sanger has strongly contested this assertion, considering himself a co-founder along with Wales, and criticizing reports that have suggested otherwise. However, Sanger has also stated: "To be clear, the idea of an open source, collaborative encyclopedia, open to contribution by ordinary people, was entirely Jimmy's, not mine, and the funding was entirely by Bomis. (...) The actual development of this encyclopedia was the task he gave me to work on." [5]

Jeremy Rosenfeld has been credited by Wales as the originator of the idea for a wiki-model encyclopedia ([6]), although the details of this are the subject of controversy between Sanger and Wales. [7]

Sanger later dropped out of the project, posting a resignation on his user page. Sanger has since criticized Wales's approach to the project [8], describing Wales as being "decidedly anti-elitist." Wales took issue with this description in the above-mentioned C-SPAN interview, describing himself as not anti-elitist, but "perhaps anti-credentialist. To me the key thing is getting it right. And if a person's really smart and they're doing fantastic work, I don't care if they're a high school kid or a Harvard professor; it's the work that matters.... You can't coast on your credentials on Wikipedia.... You have to enter the marketplace of ideas and engage with people."[9]

In mid-2003, Wales set up the Wikimedia Foundation, a St. Petersburg, Florida-based non-profit organization, to support Wikipedia and its younger sibling projects. He appointed himself and two business partners who are not Wikipedians to the five-member board; the remaining two members are elected community representatives.

Wales has since become increasingly involved with promoting and speaking about the foundation's projects. To this end, he travels the world, both to conferences and Wikimedia functions (like "Wikimeets" and Wikimania). He has frequently been engaged as a speaker.

In 2004, Wales was quoted as saying that he spent around US$500,000 on the establishment and operations of his Wiki projects. By the end of the foundation's February 2005 fund drive, the Wikimedia Foundation was being supported entirely by grants and donations.

Perhaps inspired by the success of Wikipedia, Wales has founded the for-profit company Wikia (unrelated to Wikimedia), which hosts various wikis and manages the Wikicities project.

Wales was appointed a fellow of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School in 2005. Later that year, on October 3, according to a press release [10], Wales joined the Board of Directors of Socialtext, a provider of wiki technology to businesses.

In late 2005, a controversy arose regarding Wales and the related Wikipedia entry on himself. After Wired Magazine picked up on work from Rogers Cadenhead, Wales confirmed that he had (visibly and under his own name) edited his own biography on Wikipedia, a practice generally frowned upon within the Wikipedia community and even by Wales himself [11]. Wales's edits ([12], [13] and [14]) were in line with his view that former editor Larry Sanger should not be considered a co-founder of Wikipedia. When some other editors undid his edits, Wales repeated them twice. His edits changed specific references to Wikipedia's origins as well as the description of Bomis. Wales said in the interview, "People shouldn't do it, including me. I wish I hadn't done it."

Other activities

Wales in May 2005
Enlarge
Wales in May 2005

Wales has been a passionate adherent of Objectivism, a philosophical system developed by author Ayn Rand. From 1992 to 1996 he ran the electronic mailing list "Moderated Discussion of Objectivist Philosophy" [15], and in 2002, he began moderating Atlantis, an Objectivism-related mailing list on the Objectivist community site We the Living. [16]

Wales lives in St. Petersburg, Florida, with his wife Christine and daughter Kira. He has traveled to many countries, including the United Kingdom, Belgium, and France. He is protective about his personal life, and his interests and hobbies outside of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation are mostly unknown to the general public.

Published works

  • Robert Brooks, Jon Corson and J. Donal Wales, "The Pricing of Index Options When the Underlying Assets All Follow a Lognormal Diffusion," in Advances in Futures and Options Research, volume 7, 1994. Abstract available online from the Social Science Research Network [17] [18]. See also Log-normal distribution.

Footnotes

  1. ^ Wikipedia Founder Looks Out for Number 1. URL accessed on 19 December 2005.
  2. ^ The History of Bomis. URL accessed on 3 October 2000.
  3. ^ Evan Hansen, “Wikipedia Founder Edits Own Bio”, Wired News, December 19, 2005.
  4. ^ Rhys Blakely, “Wikipedia chief considers taking ads”, Times Online, December 30, 2005.

References

External links

This audio file was created from the revision dated 2005-04-06, and does not reflect subsequent edits to the article. (audio help)
Commons
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to:
Wikinews
Wikinews has news related to this article:

News media

Audio/Video

The Intelligence of Wikipedia

Saturday, January 14, 2006

Amr Khaled at Wikipedia

om Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search
Amr Khaled, Islamic Preacher
Enlarge
Amr Khaled, Islamic Preacher

Amr Khaled (Arabic: عمرو خالد ) is a young Muslim Egyptian preacher and Islamic televangelist. He could be called a lay preacher who unexpectedly rose to fame in Egypt in recent years. His popularity has now grown all over Arab countries.

Contents

[hide]


Saturday, January 07, 2006

Wikipedia's next five years

The wiki medium, Socialtext's Ross Mayfield has said, "denatures personality." Whereas open source developers are often motivated by a desire to build strong individual reputations, Wikipedians care more about inclusiveness and consensus. Enforcing better accountability without eroding these core values will require tricky social engineering.

Judging the quality of article entries is an even trickier matter. Like open source projects, Wikipedia is a meritocracy that rewards hard work and excellent results. Neither culture values the Ph.D. for its own sake. But where open source operates in a single domain of expertise, Wikipedia spans myriad domains. While it can't hire expertise à la Digital Universe, a program to attract qualified volunteer reviewers could gain traction. [Full story at InfoWorld.com]
Wikipedia is subject to a lot of armchair quarterbacking these days, so the following recommendations should be taken with the requisite grain of salt. I'm an interested observer and sometime reader of Wikipedia, but rarely a contributor, opting instead to use my limited supply of keystrokes here. That said, outside perspectives may help clarify ways to ease Wikipedia's transition into the mainstream of society. So here goes.
  • RSS feeds. As Tim Bray and doubtless many others have noticed, Wikipedia (unlike many wikis) does not offer feeds. That's a non-issue for folks who are closely involved with the process. But for those who want to be more loosely coupled to it, syndicated feeds of watchlists, page edits, and statistics would make staying in touch a whole lot easier.
  • Change visualization. There was excellent progress on this front last summer, as I documented in a screencast. However, the proof-of-concept hasn't advanced since then. It's remarkable that third-party scripts can animate the flow of changes, but the support for such visualization properly belongs in the MediaWiki engine.
  • Stable versions. Although Wikipedia's change history does differentiate between minor and major edits, there's nothing corresponding to stable versions in open source software projects. In the early life of most articles that would be overkill. But for more mature articles, and especially active ones, version landmarks might be a useful organizational tool. Of course it's an open question as to how exactly a version could be declared stable. When the current crop of contributors agree to put a stake in the ground? When invited experts agree? A joint consensus? Whatever the convention might be, Wikipedia seems to be very adept at inventing and following conventions. It's interesting to imagine a view latest stable version option with, of course, a transparent view into whatever "stable" is defined to be.
  • Trackbacks. Savvy users of Wikipedia know that it's a jumping-off point for research, not a final destination. Whatever you may think about the quality of an entry on a given topic, it is often a great source of relevant external links. But there's no aggregation of inbound links. I use the term trackback metaphorically here, because I don't think a literal implementation of the trackback mechanism would be appropriate. However, the reaction to a page -- as expressed in bookmarking services, on blogs, and elsewhere -- can be assembled and displayed. This stuff need not, and arguably should not, be included directly in Wikipedia. It might more properly be done using a third-party service in cahoots with a local Greasemonkey-style transformation.

Wikipedia's fifth birthday is right around the corner. It's been an amazing half-decade, and I'm really looking forward to the sequel.


Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Ahmad Bin Byat and Wikipedia

Ahmad Abdullah Juma Bin Byat is Director General of the Dubai Technology and Media Free Zone Authority in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. He has a management background through American education and held several roles in Etisalat, the local telecom monopoly in the UAE until he became the deputy manager of Dubai Branch.

In 1999, he was selected the CEO of the Dubai Internet City. He was in charge of establishing the new initiative to host international companies and bring them to Dubai, especially in the fields of E-commerce and IT. After a restructure in the whole free zone in 2002, he was chosen to be the Director General of the Free Zone.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Why the media can't get Wikipedia right:

Anti-Executive Summary
Things this piece does not say

  1. Wikipedia is always right
  2. Wikipedia will asymptotically achieve a point of total rightness
  3. Wikipedia is the only source anyone should consult
  4. Wikipedia is impervious to criticism
  5. Wikipedia is better than science, sex and scientific sex
  6. Wikipedia is totally new and there's never been anything like it
  7. Anyone who criticizes Wikipedia is a doody head
  8. Jimmy Wales is G-d.

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Imagine a world in which every person has free access
to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing.

And we need your help.

Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express, eCheck accepted

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. is a non-profit organization with the goal of providing free knowledge to every person in the world. Meeting this goal through the maintenance, development and distribution of free content, Wikimedia relies on public donations to run its wiki-based projects.

Wikimedia provides computing and network resources to create and distribute many reference works including Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikinews, Wikisource and the Wikimedia Commons. The content of these projects is provided to the public free of charge.

How your donation will help

All of our sites are free from advertisements. Visitors are not charged to edit, read or use our content. We rely entirely on donations to fund our projects. Our unprecedented growth in traffic and content requires regular hardware updates to prevent outages without sacrificing functionality. Other outgoings include bandwidth costs, rackspace within a colocation center, purchase of Wikimedia's domain names, sponsorship of specific software development tasks, and, occasionally, travel expenses.

See Budget/2005 for our latest budget, which details where the money will go, and meta:Wikimedia servers/hardware orders for details of the hardware we ordered after our last fundraising drive.